Reintegration of temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine based on sustainability

Authors

  • Любов Валеріївна Жарова д.е.н., с.н.с., професор кафедри міждисциплінарної освіти, Києво-Могилянська школа професійної та неперервної освіти, вул. Григорія Сковороди, 2, Київ 04070, Україна 0000-0002-3568-775X
  • Євген Володимирович Хлобистов д.е.н., проф., декан факультету природничих наук, Києво-Могилянська академія, вул. Григорія Сковороди, 2, Київ 04070, Україна 0000-0002-9983-9062

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17846453

Keywords:

management, governance, reintegration, sustainable development, recovery, post-conflict transformation, PESTEL analysis

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose. This article examines the reintegration of Ukraine’s temporarily occupied territories through the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The study aims to identify barriers, opportunities, and priority directions for rebuilding territories with different levels of destruction and various depths of occupation. It focuses on Occupied Territories, that address multifaceted issues, focusing on policies for IDPs, humanitarian assistance, and restoration efforts. Methods. The research applies an interdisciplinary methodology, integrating PESTEL analysis, scenario-based assessment of de-occupation, evaluation of socio-economic recovery potential, and alignment with priority SDGs. A case-based comparison of Bakhmut, Melitopol, and Sevastopol highlights structural differences in development prospects. Results. Findings demonstrate that reintegration requires combining urgent restoration of critical infrastructure with long-term sustainable development strategies. A cluster of essential SDGs – 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, and 17 – forms the basis for local recovery planning. City-specific priorities were identified: Bakhmut requires complete reconstruction and green redevelopment; Melitopol needs modernization of the agro-industrial base and critical infrastructure; Sevastopol faces the most complex political, social, and environmental transformation, including economic reorientation and addressing systemic water scarcity. Conclusions. Reintegration is feasible only through a multi-vector strategy grounded in institutional resilience, inclusive governance, innovative recovery models, and strong international partnerships. The SDGs serve as a strategic framework for post-conflict transformation and rebuilding social cohesion. The study also emphasizes the need for a unified state reintegration authority and a strengthened human-capital base.

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Жарова, Л. В., & Хлобистов, Є. В. (2025). Reintegration of temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine based on sustainability. Current Issues of Economic Sciences, (17). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17846453