Механізм державного регулювання підприємницької діяльності у кризових умовах
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14441856Keywords:
business, entrepreneurial activity, state regulation, regulatory policy, deregulationAbstract
The article focuses on developing the components of the state regulation mechanism for entrepreneurial activity under crisis conditions. The purpose of the article is to enhance the components of the state regulation mechanism for entrepreneurial activity during crises. The effectiveness of post-war recovery depends on numerous internal and external factors, with the entrepreneurial sector playing a key role as an important driver of economic growth. The article employs systematic, comparative, and structural-functional approaches, along with methods of analysis and synthesis.
The research highlights that the full-scale war has caused significant losses to the entrepreneurial sector. However, enterprise performance indicators confirm that Ukrainian businesses have not only survived but are also rapidly growing. The study identifies current problems facing Ukrainian businesses, including: direct and indirect threats from the war; existing economic issues that significantly complicate companies’ financial stability; reduced consumer activity; shifts in demand for certain goods or services; employee mental health issues; maintaining existing human resources and attracting new specialists; logistical and transportation challenges; and new regulatory demands.
It is demonstrated that addressing these issues depends on the existing state regulatory mechanism for entrepreneurial activity, which involves categorizing methods and tools into three areas: legal and regulatory, administrative, and economic. The article emphasizes that solving these problems is not solely the responsibility of the state but also of businesses themselves.
In a crisis, businesses need to focus on real-time monitoring of internal and external factors, maintaining flexibility, and increasing resilience. For the state, key directions to improve regulatory mechanisms during crises include: adjusting regulatory methods and tools to address current challenges; expanding financing and insurance instruments to mitigate external impacts on enterprises; optimizing the reservation system for enterprise employees; stimulating export-oriented production; developing new state programs; and implementing policies to create new jobs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Віта Павлівна Горієнко, Едуард Іванович Богдан

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.