Theory of Entrepreneurial Culture of Regional Economic Systems

Abstract

Abstract. The study examines the entrepreneurial culture of regional economic systems within social space and social time. The aim of the study is to deploy and demonstrate the integrity of the socio-cultural architectonics of attractive-paternal dynamics within the socio-economic space and axiological-existential time. Research methods: both general scientific and special methods and techniques of scientific cognition were used, in particular: theoretical and logical generalization, a systematic approach, and retrospective analysis. Results. Culture in economics is interpreted as a cycle wave on a discrete dynamic scale of phase transitions in the ratio of the measure of attractiveness to the measure of entropy. It is argued that the sociocultural dynamics of economic systems are based on the bi-attractive principle of alternative paradigmatic projects of economic development. Processes of sociocultural dynamics between attractive origins proceed in the form of trialectic paternal configurations within the quadra-hierarchical architectonics of social development and reproduction. The quadra-structure of social architectonics includes: the micro-level of basic paternal business triads, the meso-level of institutional complementarity, the macro-level of sociocultural dynamics, and the mega-level of civilizational dominants. It is asserted that the structure of each trialectic paternal configuration represents an interconnected triad of economic actors: the α-organizational pattern, the β-reinforcing pattern, and the γ-homeostatic pattern. The movement of trialectic paternal configurations occurs through the following phase transitions: incubation, bifurcation-growth, acmatic, fracture, inertia, obscuration, regeneration, and homeostatic phases. All processes of sociocultural dynamics occur between attractors of two dominant culture types: sensate and ideational, each having its trialectic modifications. Sensate culture includes active-sensate, passive-sensate, and cynical-sensate; ideational culture includes active-ideational, pseudo-ideational, and ascetic-ideational. The modes of sociocultural dynamics are the paradigm (as a project of development) and the pattern (as a project of reproduction). The movement vector of lower-level trialectic paternal configurations is determined by the nature and intensity of axiological temporality of higher-level attractive entities. The α-pattern is responsible for project dissemination, the β-pattern for converting ideas into practice, and the γ-pattern for the final result in the form of monetary income. Conclusions. Modernity is interpreted as the final phase of the incubation period for the formation of ideational culture. The application of digital and quantum technologies marks the end of the cycle wave of the dominant sensate culture, where the axiological narrative was aimed at the external mechanical subjugation of nature. The new ideational type of culture and mentality will be realized through a system of new economic relations — nooeconomics, driven by a qualitatively new productive force of meritocratic capital — the cognitariat.